Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04884
Original file (BC 2013 04884.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-04884

	XXXXXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

On 3 Mar 14 the applicant submitted an additional request for his FA scores on 26 Sep 12 and 31 Oct 12 to be removed from AFFMS.
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a medical condition during the contested FAs, which precluded him from obtaining a satisfactory overall rating.

The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation.  His commander submitted the request to remove the 12 Sep 13 FA from his record, but it had already been entered into AFFMS.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

At the time of the contested FA the applicant was serving as a Technical Sergeant (E-6) in the regular Air Force.

On 26 Sep 12, 31 Oct 12 and 12 Sep 13, the applicant participated in the contested FAs and attained unsatisfactory composite scores.

IAW AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 13, states any military member can appeal his or her Fitness Assessment through a Wing-Level Appeals Board and through the AFPC Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), within two years of discovering the error/injustice.

In accordance with AFI 36-2905, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he or she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his or her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the unit commander within five days of the assessment.  If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the unit commander may invalidate the test results.  The Airman will then be required to retest within five duty days or when capable based on the recommendations of the medical provider and the Exercise Physiologist (EP).

In accord with AFI 36-2905_ AFGM5 (3 Jan 13), paragraphs 2.3.2 through 2.3.2.2, all members must complete the Fitness Screening Questionnaire (FSQ) prior to taking a FA.  The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 but no later than 7 calendar days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete an FSQ does not invalidate the FA.  A medical provider must evaluate all members with health issues identified on the FSQ prior to the FA.  Member must notify the Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM) of the assessment/training clearance status from the provider.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for void/removal of FA dated 12 Sep 13. Specifically, the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of military records. 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 20 Feb 14 for redirection. 

On 3 Mar 14 the applicant submitted a rebuttal email to the AFBCMR. In the rebuttal he makes an additional request for his FA scores on 26 Sep 12 and 31 Oct 12 to be removed.  He also noted a satisfactory FA he completed on 27 Jan 14.

The applicant submitted, in support of his rebuttal, medical documents relating to radiology, pathology, cardiovascular, and medications prescribed.  Additionally, he submitted an updated copy of his AFFMS report. 

The applicant’s complete rebuttal, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

_______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has not exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3.	Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant removal of the FA dated 12 Sep 13.  Although the applicant has failed to exhaust the existing subordinate levels of review prior to seeking relief before this Board, we find a sufficient basis to remove the 12 Sep 13 FA.  In particular, the applicant has provided medical documentation validating that he had a medical condition at the time of the FA and a letter from his commander requesting that the FA be invalidated. Since this is sufficient evidence to grant the application, there would be nothing to be gained by insisting that the applicant apply for subordinate review. Therefore, being mindful of administrative economy, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below.

4.	Notwithstanding the above, we find insufficient evidence to warrant taking action on the 26 Sep 12 and 31 Oct 12 FAs.  Unlike the 12 Sep 13 FA, the two later FAs lack a recommendation from the unit commander in support of their removal from the applicant’s record.  There is thus insufficient relevant evidence to support this portion of the applicant’s request.  Moreover, since this Board is the highest level of administrative review within the Air Force, once a final decision has been rendered the applicant will no longer be able to avail himself of the existing subordinate levels of administrative review.  Effectively, he would be denied the chance to perfect his case.  The applicant should therefore be advised that the Board is returning this portion of his application without action.  Additionally, the Board cannot grant reconsideration on this portion of his request unless and until he has exhausted all other avenues of relief.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Fitness Assessment, dated 12 Sep 13, be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________




The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04884 in Executive Session on 21 May 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	XXXXXXXXXX, Chair
	XXXXXXXXXX, Member
	XXXXXXXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 21 Oct 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 15 Jan 14.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Feb 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01755

    Original file (BC 2013 01755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For non-AGR ARC, Airmen will be required to retest the next date they are in appropriate military duty status and official FAs are being conducted.” In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2., “All members must complete the FSQ prior to FA (Attachment 4).” In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2.1, “The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days (90 days for ARC), but...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04414

    Original file (BC 2013 04414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04414 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 12 Aug 08, 27 Apr 10, 29 Jul l0, 3 Nov l0, and 24 Apr 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 7 May 12 she was medically evaluated, at the request of her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04136

    Original file (BC 2013 04136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 Jan 13 the applicant completed the contested FA with an unsatisfactory score. On 14 Feb 14, the applicants request was considered and partially granted by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB). The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03162

    Original file (BC 2013 03162.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score AC Component Rating 11 Jun 13 Exempt Exempt Exempt all four categories *29 May 13 0.0 36.00”/0.00 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 29 Oct 12 85.50 32.50”/17.10 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 23 Apr 12 100.00 31.00”/20.00 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 31 Oct 11 79.50 33.50”/15.90 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01802

    Original file (BC 2013 01802.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last eight FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 13 Nov 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) 9 May 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) *25 Mar 13 33.33 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from PU) *12 Dec 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 28 Jun 12 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) *19 Mar 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 2 Aug 11 84.70 Satisfactory 28 Apr 11 77.90 Unsatisfactory (minimum SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04883

    Original file (BC 2013 04883.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal the applicant submits; an Emergency Care Center Discharge, signed by his medical provider on 1 Aug 13, which indicates the applicant was diagnosed with “weakness and low phosphate.” Additionally, he includes the following supporting documentation: Result sheet for the contested FA, DD 422 Notification of Members Qualification Status dated 27 Sep 12 and 26 Sep 10 indicating he was exempt from push-ups, FA history, excerpts from his medical record, and a letter from...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05435

    Original file (BC 2013 05435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. In view of this and since this avenue of administrative relief was available at the time the applicant submitted his application, we find it would be inappropriate to consider this application for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02960

    Original file (BC 2013 02960.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An AF Form 422 dated 5 Oct 11 with the following statement: “Cleared for the following AF Fitness assessment components: Ht, Wt, AC, 1.0 mile walk.” The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, indicating there is no documentation provided by the applicant’s commander to invalidate the contested FA. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jan 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02523

    Original file (BC 2014 02523.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a “Medical Determination Letter,” signed by his medical provider and indicating he had a condition that precluded him from passing the FAs dated 4 Jun 12 and 23 Aug 12 and a commander invalidation memorandum, requesting that the FA dated 30 May 13 be removed. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the removal of the contested FAs due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01677

    Original file (BC 2014 01677.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Examiner’s Note: In his application the member states that he submits a memorandum from his medical provider and a letter from his commander. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the removal of the contested FA due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. Furthermore, the Board cannot grant reconsideration on this portion of his request unless and until he has exhausted all other avenues of relief.